The practice of mandating busing plans to remedy school segregation patterns was approved in the case of

The practice of mandating busing plans to remedy school segregation patterns was approved in the case of

• A. Brown v. Board of Education.
• B. Green v. County School Board of New Kent County.
• C. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education.
• D. Plessy v. Ferguson.

Answer: (C)

The main idea here is how courts authorize remedies to undo school segregation, including using busing to mix students from different neighborhoods. After Brown v. Board of Education declared segregation unconstitutional, the question became how to implement real integration. While Brown set the principle, it did not prescribe a specific remedy. Plessy v. Ferguson had previously established the notion of “separate but equal” and was overturned by Brown, so it isn’t the source of the remedy in question. Green v. County School Board of New Kent County looked at a supposed “freedom of choice” plan and found it inadequate to dismantle segregated systems, signaling limits on certain approaches. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education is the case that approved busing as a legitimate tool to achieve desegregation. The Court held that federal courts could oversee and order busing and other remedies to eliminate the effects of segregation and move toward a unitary, non‑racially segregated system. This decision explicitly legitimized mandating busing plans as part of the remedy to past discrimination, making it the best answer.

The main idea here is how courts authorize remedies to undo school segregation, including using busing to mix students from different neighborhoods. After Brown v. Board of Education declared segregation unconstitutional, the question became how to implement real integration. While Brown set the principle, it did not prescribe a specific remedy. Plessy v. Ferguson had previously established the notion of “separate but equal” and was overturned by Brown, so it isn’t the source of the remedy in question. Green v. County School Board of New Kent County looked at a supposed “freedom of choice” plan and found it inadequate to dismantle segregated systems, signaling limits on certain approaches.

Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education is the case that approved busing as a legitimate tool to achieve desegregation. The Court held that federal courts could oversee and order busing and other remedies to eliminate the effects of segregation and move toward a unitary, non‑racially segregated system. This decision explicitly legitimized mandating busing plans as part of the remedy to past discrimination, making it the best answer.