The Annapolis meeting was not well attended. Which statement accurately describes its attendance?

The Annapolis meeting was not well attended. Which statement accurately describes its attendance?

• A. It was not well attended
• B. It was well attended
• C. It had no attendees
• D. It was canceled before it began

Answer: (A)

Interpreting a statement about attendance. The sentence given already says the Annapolis meeting was not well attended, so the accurate description is that attendance was low or poor relative to expectations. This fits because “not well attended” directly describes turnout as insufficient, without implying zero attendees or a cancellation. The other possibilities don’t match the wording or its implications: saying it was well attended contradicts the stated description, claiming there were no attendees goes beyond “not well attended,” and saying it was canceled introduces a different event status not mentioned here.

Interpreting a statement about attendance. The sentence given already says the Annapolis meeting was not well attended, so the accurate description is that attendance was low or poor relative to expectations.

This fits because “not well attended” directly describes turnout as insufficient, without implying zero attendees or a cancellation. The other possibilities don’t match the wording or its implications: saying it was well attended contradicts the stated description, claiming there were no attendees goes beyond “not well attended,” and saying it was canceled introduces a different event status not mentioned here.